Adaptive Proposer for Ultimatum Game
نویسندگان
چکیده
Ultimate Game serves for extensive studies of various aspects of human decision making. The current paper contribute to them by designing proposer optimising its policy using Markov-decision-process (MDP) framework combined with recursive Bayesian learning of responder’s model. Its foreseen use: i) standardises experimental conditions for studying rationality and emotion-influenced decision making of human responders; ii) replaces the classical game-theoretical design of the players’ policies by an adaptive MDP, which is more realistic with respect to the knowledge available to individual players and decreases player’s deliberation effort; iii) reveals the need for approximate learning and dynamic programming inevitable for coping with the curse of dimensionality; iv) demonstrates the influence of the fairness attitude of the proposer on the game course; v) prepares the test case for inspecting exploration-exploitation dichotomy.
منابع مشابه
Preference and strategy in proposer’s prosocial giving in the ultimatum game
The accumulation of findings that most responders in the ultimatum game reject unfair offers provides evidence that humans are driven by social preferences such as preferences for fairness and prosociality. On the other hand, if and how the proposer's behavior is affected by social preferences remains unelucidated. We addressed this question for the first time by manipulating the knowledge that...
متن کاملFairness versus reason in the ultimatum game.
In the Ultimatum Game, two players are offered a chance to win a certain sum of money. All they must do is divide it. The proposer suggests how to split the sum. The responder can accept or reject the deal. If the deal is rejected, neither player gets anything. The rational solution, suggested by game theory, is for the proposer to offer the smallest possible share and for the responder to acce...
متن کاملChoices in Two-Person Interactions: The Effect of Amount and Social Distance on Offers in the Dictator and Ultimatum Games
Proposers in the Dictator Game and the Ultimatum Game often do not act as normative economic theory predicts. Offers are frequently higher than what would be considered income maximizing. The present study investigates two effects on the amount offered by the proposer. The first is whether the initial amount provided to the proposer systematically affects the amount offered (a magnitude effect)...
متن کاملPartner Selection and the Division of Surplus: Evidence from Ultimatum and Dictator Experiments
We study ultimatum and dictator environments with one-way, unenforceable pre-play communication from the proposer to the recipient, semantically framed as a promise. After observing this promise regarding how much the proposer will offer if selected, in our treatment conditions, recipients choose whether or not to select a particular proposer. We find that offers can increase in the ultimatum g...
متن کاملThe spatial ultimatum game.
In the ultimatum game, two players are asked to split a certain sum of money. The proposer has to make an offer. If the responder accepts the offer, the money will be shared accordingly. If the responder rejects the offer, both players receive nothing. The rational solution is for the proposer to offer the smallest possible share, and for the responder to accept it. Human players, in contrast, ...
متن کاملDeliberation-Aware Responder in Multi-proposer Ultimatum Game
The article studies deliberation aspects by modelling a responder in multi-proposers ultimatum game (UG). Compared to the classical UG, deliberative multi-proposers UG suggests that at each round the responder selects the proposer to play with. Any change of the proposer (compared to the previous round) is penalised. The simulation results show that though switching of proposers incurred non-ne...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016